Subscribe to Blog

Your email:

Follow Us

Looking for answers?

condo association blogCan't find the answer you're looking for?  Ask your question here and we'll post it in our blog.

Browse by Topic

Condo Association Management Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Pets in Condos: Frivolous Condo Pet Rules

  
  
  
  
  

Our condo Board squandered over $25,000 in a lengthy legal battle against me, demanding that I remove my beloved pet. I was a whistleblower over mold in the common areas. The Board action was a blatant attempt to silence my warnings.

After 18 months, the Board caved in, and I was declared the prevailing party! I then documented lessons learned during this grueling battle in Defend Your Condo & Homeowner Rights: What You Must Do When the Board Turns Your Life Upside Down!

A condo or HOA legal battle is often emotionally and physically shattering. The owner is trapped in a choking fog, disconnected from reality, and can’t see a way out. One feels alone, helpless and exhausted.

Fear of being forced to part with a beloved pet is especially devastating. Few understand what you are going through.

A condo owner living in Atlanta contacted me recently with a pressing problem. His condo Board alleged that his 14-year-old female dog exceeded a 30-pound pet-weight rule and eventually imposed fines totaling more than $2000.

The condominium documents permitted pets and made no reference to this weight restriction. The Board president insisted that the Board had a right to impose the rule without an Association vote. However, he was unwilling or unable to provide official Board minutes or public record documenting a Board vote on the matter, nor approval by the Association attorney.

The board didn’t weigh the dog, and they didn’t ask the owner to provide proof of the dog’s weight. The action was apparently based on hear-say and/or eye-sight alone.

The condo owner rallied his neighbors. Within four months, association members voted to repeal the so-called pet-weight rule. The owner immediately requested that his fines be repealed. After all, the Board never weighed his dog, and the so-called pet-weight rule had been rescinded.

The Board held firm. To make matters worse, a Board member stated at an Association meeting that a portion of the owner’s monthly assessment payment had been applied each month to the late-fee account (or shall I say, the Board member publicly acknowledged that the Board “commingled” the two accounts).

Failing to pay one’s assessment fees, as many condo owners are aware, could result in a lean on your home. The Board did not tell him how much of his monthly assessment payments had been “reallocated.”

I shared this story with our own condo property manager — admittedly an enlightened individual. He was shocked. “Board members must realize that they are human beings first,” he said. “In this case, the only neighborly thing was to immediately drop the fines.”

The moral of the story: Condo Board members (trustees!) often forget that they were elected by association members to serve the community. Serve, not dictate, is the operative word.

The condo owner has now taken specific steps to defend his rights. And by the way, his beloved dog’s name is Bean. He says she is a real Human Bean.

Copyright 2007 by Dr. Joyce Starr. All Rights Reserved.


Dr. Joyce Starr is author of Defend Your Condo & Homeowner Rights: What You Must Do When the Board Turns Your Life Upside Down! She is also publisher of the first Homeowner Defense Kit, a trilogy of works dealing with condo and homeowner rights. She also provides Homeowner TeleConsultations.

Tags: ,

Comments

What an awful story. Thank goodness it had a happy ending. I can't imagine anyone asking me to part with my lovely Roxy, even though she is only 6 lbs!
Thanks for sharing. Hopefully this will help other pet-lovers.
Posted @ Monday, January 28, 2008 3:23 PM by Tina
This is another case of a board allowing emotion to cloud their judgment and reason, to the detriment of the community.
From the perspective of a portfolio manager, there is a lot left out. The board may have refused to seek advice from their legal counsel, or ignored it. They may not have gotten advice from their association manager, or maybe they got bad advice.
The "commingling" of funds portion of this story bothers me, though. If you read most documents in most states, costs of collection, late fees, other fees and fines become part of the assessment. There is no "commingling." However, they should be recorded separately and with small effort it should be easy to determine the different charges. Each charge to an account should be listed.
From an accounting standpoint, money coming in is all income, and usually comes in under one operating account. The breakdown for associations is in operating and reserve accounts, and how many of each accounts you need to want or have.
Many documents also state that any amount owed constitutes an automatic lien. If a liend filed in a court of law was completed or not is another matter.
The "enlightened" association manager was correct though - waiving the fees would be the neighborly thing to do. I'd go further than that; not only would it be neighborly, but it is the right thing to do and business wise, the prudent thing to do.
Posted @ Wednesday, January 30, 2008 4:33 PM by Joe Schuirmann
It is strange that I came upon the post regarding the dog because I have notices going out soon that the dogs must go. 
We have some huge dogs here and they do their business on the complex where kids play. They often bark at night.  
The association voted out dogs at the last meeting.  
I myself love dogs but I did happen to step in a huge pile of you know what and it did not go over well with me needless to say. 
I like dogs and cats myself but the problem is out of hand here. One tenant has 3 dogs. One of the dogs barks at night.I can see having a dog if it is well cared for and consideration given to other tenants.There are people who take good care of their dogs but when they are turned loose outside at night and use the grounds as a potty it does not bode well.Pets are a real source of comfort and I feel this ruling is a bit extreme but I am only one person on the board of many.It is possible that maybe the tenants can agree to our ruling to take care of their dogs and not just turn them loose on the complex unsupervised. No doubt the notices will cause an uproar and it will come back on me and the assn president.I am more then willing to have a meeting with the tenants regarding the care of their dogs that they not be allowed to disturb other tenants or do their business on the complex where children play. I have a heart for all living creatures but I am also one of the persons who does everything from painting to cleaning outside.I am also inundated by tenants when they feel something is unfair. I hope we can resolve this problem without banning all dogs but will see how the notices go. Maybe the notices can be a wake up call that dogs need to be cared for properly. I realize that dogs are a source of comfort and I care . We have nice tenants here and some do take care of their dogs. It is a problem that needs to be taken care of in some way as it is clearly out of hand. 
On a different subject we had an awful problem with parking spaces and people using spaces that do not belong to them. We did solve that problem but not without people upset.I worked with people. Any time there is a change there will be some who will not be very happy.I am going to handle the dog situation as best I can but am not looking forward to the flack I am going to get.
Posted @ Saturday, January 28, 2012 10:15 AM by Mari
We have a simple policy. NO DOGS. However there is an exception. If you wish to have a dog you pay an initial fee of $200 plus $20.00 per day thereafter. (This fee schedule was suggested by an owner who never resided. She paid $6000 for vet services in one year for her pooch.)
Posted @ Monday, May 21, 2012 5:45 PM by Frank MA
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics