Subscribe to Blog

Your email:

Follow Us

Looking for answers?

condo association blogCan't find the answer you're looking for?  Ask your question here and we'll post it in our blog.

Browse by Topic

Condo Association Management Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Developer leaves condo association with expensive, financial mess.

  
  
  
  
  
I am a residential unit owner and Board president of a small condominium complex in New Jersey. The complex consists of 8 residential units, and 8 commercial units. The complex was completed in the 2008 time frame, and remained unoccupied, as the prices were set at the height of the real estate boom. In mid-2009, the original developer dropped the prices dramatically, and the 8 residential units all sold by October 2009. None of the commercial units sold, but one was leased to a tenant. The developer was the “Sponsor” of the project, and had the duty to establish the Board of Trustees and hold an Association meeting. After asking the sponsor several times about holding the meeting, we finally found out in January of 2010 that the ownership and Sponsor rights had been transferred to another entity (due to what I believe were financial difficulties of the original owner). Prior to this, the original developer was paying the monthly assessments for the 8 commercial units. Once the transfer in ownership took place, the new owner of the commercial units, and project Sponsor, stopped paying the commercial assessments (even for the leased unit).

All attempts to communicate with them went unanswered. Since the Board had not been established, and the Association was not formed, we residential owners had no other choice but to engage a lawyer and sue the new owner (as individuals) for back assessments (around the August 2010 timeframe). We felt we had a pretty good case, but of course, the legal system has a way of complicating things. The judge (Chancellery court), allowed the defendants’ attorney to claim they weren’t paying the assessments because the commercial units were not complete, yet they were, as they are on the 1st floor of a 3 story building. They weren’t fit-out as there weren’t tenants, but all structural components were completed; in fact we had copies of the Certificates of Occupancy for them. The judge instead appointed another attorney to act as Receiver, whose job it was to establish the Board. He appointed another attorney to act as a mediator to try and get the 2 sides to come to an agreement. Since then, as individuals, we’ve incurred over $50k in attorney fees, the Association has paid the Receiver and mediator in excess of $25k. After numerous court hearings and pleadings, the new owner has slowly agreed to pay his back dues and future dues. We are awaiting the last ~$9k payment (not including any late fees or penalties). Now the big issue is attorneys’ fees, and the purpose of my question. The judge, for some reason, believes this needs to go to trial to determine. We are hesitant to expend more money and potentially come away with nothing. To those of you who might have gone through similar circumstances, do you think we have a case for awarding of attorney’s fees?

Comments

Would love to know the answer to this as we may have a similar issue here in Missouri. I understand in domestic cases the tendency is for both parties to have to incur their own legal expenses.
Posted @ Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:33 AM by mary
Remember that our laws are written primarily by lawyers for the benefit of other lawyers.
Posted @ Saturday, May 21, 2011 12:18 PM by Charles Adler
Or as the Boards' lawyer seems to have told them - you are the Board. Interpret them however you feel you need to. Slightly unfair to the owners I'd say. Never, ever move in without actual comprehending the actual meaning of By Laws, Rules and Regs and Declaration.
Posted @ Saturday, May 21, 2011 1:55 PM by mary
What does a) the developer b) the insurance agent and c) the insurer say when you ask for reimbursement of attorney fees or indemnity? 
 
As a group of owners, are you able to ask those questions and get an answer? Let me know. 
 
BETP Inc.
Posted @ Sunday, May 22, 2011 11:41 PM by BETP Inc
The original developer is out of the picture, as they sold their units and sponsor rights to the new entity running the project. The insurance company doesn't care, because we residential owners had to pony up the money to pay the premiums. Our mortageges would have gone into default without insurance.
Posted @ Wednesday, May 25, 2011 7:27 AM by Bruce
This same scene has happened in Minnesota. We were sold residentail units and found out after we closed our building is part of a condo hotel. The developer went bankrupt, We are missing two years of reserve funds for years dues were not levied and collected.The manager, hired by the bank, made us pay back his owner friend who paid dues to the developer that disappeared with the developer and never went into our HOA bank account. The builder never finished punch lists and left unadequate plumbing and missing insulation. A lawsuit against the developer never got to court because it cost too much money. The banker and his freind the manager run the association and force residential owners to supplement the condo-hotel run on their property. Next month is the 3 year period marking the end of declaraant control..what to do next? One thing we have done is approach our city about regulating condo hotels before this scam happens again.  
 
 
 
Why is there no nationsl press about this kind of stuff going on? 
 
Posted @ Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:08 PM by Judy Gordon
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics