Our Board has issued the following statement; "In circumstances where the appearance of the building is altered in the course of a maintenance project to address safety, the building code, health concerns or to take advantage improvements in available technology of the better engineered products or remedy a design or construction defect, a 75% vote of the unit owners in not required". Is this statement true? If so, how do they prove any or all if the extenuating circumstances? Pompano Beach, FL
Please drag open the comment box from right bottom corner to make it larger.
Please note that blog comments and postings are not legal advice, rather only the opinions of our readers.