Multiple successful efforts were made to block the sale of my unit. Why? Because I had the temerity to run for the Board. I have an extensive background in property management and maintenance and a proven record of innovation and cost containment. The Board President has a landscape contract that was granted to him without a vote. He might even get enough votes since this a Senior building with a large share of developmentally challenged individuals. This group is easily of manipulated. A cult of personality similar to Jonestown exists. The Board is dominated and manipulated by this individual. I moved back into my place after the Board killed the last sale. I have decided to let a friend live with me. They want to describe this as a rental but that is when somebody buys the unit, does not live there, and then rents it out. In order to reside in the property you must be an approved occupant. My contention is that there are three things the board are limited to. 1) supplying a copy of the rules and having the person sign and acknowledge 2) a copy of their drivers license or proof of identity and their vehicle information if there is any and 3) Making sure that it does not jeopardize our 5013c status. This not a personality content. Although I understand the motive for background checks, to my knowledge this has only been applied to my friends recent application. I believe this is another attempt to deny me of my rights. Nothing is stated in our bylaws that mentions the need for this. Would this not require owners approval. It also opens up the gray area of interpretation. " Lets see, you had a parking ticket so you are denied" I need advice on this.
Answers (10)
What are your thoughts on this topic? Please share your answers below. We ask that you remain respectful of each other, and be advised that responses are monitored.